Why is it that any scrubber, two bit journalist or public speaker, or any moron can express their disgust and spit their venom at the plight of the alcoholic and at alcoholism in general and they get away with it?
Why is the alcoholic fair game?
I have never seen such hatred expressed on any other person or institution like it is on the alcoholic.
If they were to criticize drug addicts for leaving filthy needles around, or homosexuals for spreading AIDS , religion for horrific persecution, or if they were to challenge politicians for shocking lies, and the list goes on. If they were to target any of these people the way they do alcoholics they would receive a backlash to no end.
The do-gooders would be up in arms. The men in black suits would be at work. Not so though when it comes to alcoholism. Anyone can take as many pot-shots as they like towards the alcoholic without fear of contradiction or reprisal.
If the same journalists and the like dared to print the trash they do, and including to spread their crappy cheap jokes about any person other than the alcoholic, they would be criticized and be rejected by society.
If they made derogatory remarks about a race or creed they could and most likely would be faced with charges of defamation, they’d be called racist or worse reprisals would be a sure result.
Not though when it comes to the character assassination of the alcoholic. He or she is considered fair game and is considered to be open slather to abhorrence. Any nit can claim a free reign to express disgust towards alcoholism including a recent statement that the alcoholic does not deserve to live.
This type of cretin never produces any facts to substantiate hateful vendettas. Apparently they don’t have to. No one questions their authenticity or motives.
Motives which are purely to gain an emotional reaction from readers or in public speaking, from the audience. You’ve probably heard the saying, “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance then baffle them with bulldust” (cleaned up a little) certainly applies to many people that comment on the subject of alcoholism.
Knowing the falsities involved I make this statement. The reason they don’t need to justify outrageous claims and untruths is because, the person, namely the alcoholic, that they vilify, does in fact not exist?
They get a desired reaction by appealing to the readers emotions and by playing on reader’s ignorance about alcoholism. They get away with abhorrence towards the alcoholic because the reader does not know, what it is that constitutes an alcoholic and don’t know what the difference is between a derelict in the park and an alcoholic.
This trickery is how journalists get away with printing utter rubbish about alcoholism. They do it without upsetting sponsors, the alcohol advertisers. The results achieved is to be blaming the victim (the alcoholic) for his own plight and therefor is not blaming the alcohol for the problems. Journalists have painted untrue pictures of what it is that constitutes an alcoholic. But they are not artists by a long shot… except maybe BS artists.
Due to this alcoholics are wrongly depicted in many ways. He is many times portrayed as the derelict in the park. Or as the park bench drunk. This is simply not true. Hopefully with a little help from this blog hopefully the lies will soon be realised by many unsuspecting readers. I am now exposing some of them for what they are. Right here, and right now – people who tell such lies are fraudsters.
The problems they create however by the lies is that the true victim still suffers. The person who is allergic to alcoholic. He is in fact the true alcoholic and is the one who is dead by around 30 years of age. That is if he does not stop drinking. Death is a definite results if he does not stay sober. His chances of achieving this desired result are slim. The odds are stacked highly against him. This is mainly due to misinformation told on the true facts about alcoholism are not revealed. If the true facts were revealed possibly the disaster of alcoholism could be avoided. Possibly not to the liking of alcohol advertisers.
The true facts are that the alcoholic does not get support from anywhere, and lately not even from AA. AA has changed and the change is not for the better. Anyone wanting to get sober has to fight for survival in AA meetings as well. It can be that he is seen as the perpetrator there also and not as the victim of alcohol. He is instead the victim of a dangerous, delusive drug called alcohol. He is also the victim of people who are looking for customers and who are in AA masquerading as alcoholics.
The alcohol advertisers have spent their billion$ wisely, from their own perspective that is. Unfortunately so many young intelligent beautiful people are dying each year as a direct result of alcohol. Facts are that these kids (some of them) do not live long enough to even recognize or realize that they are allergic to alcohol and that therefore they are alcoholic, and that it happened to them from the very first drink of alcohol.
The two-bit journalists and the would-be’s-if-they-could-be’s are in fact one of the a main reasons why the young people of today do not live long enough to get sober. They do not get the correct information needed to be able to make an informed decision. They need to be able to make an informed decision as to whether or not to drink alcohol in the first place.
As far as I am aware there are no negative results of statistics taken on Schoolies Week. There are many negative results as a result of this horror celebration. If there were statistics taken then possibly many of the devastating results would be revealed. Including how many kids actually die during this period or shortly afterwards. No statistics taken on how many of these kids forget about the plans they had for the future once they started to drink alcohol. They have plans for further education and for a career and it goes after schoolies. The plans they had for a successful life has gone out the window and is replaced by the thinking of a drunk with problems.
One important question that needs to be answered is: How many of these kids are actually able to stop drinking and get back to a normal life once Schoolies Week is over?
A large percentage can not stop drinking and some do not live long enough to make it through the doors of AA. Even if they do make it, it is said around AA meetings that only 1% of the people coming through the doors actually stay around for any length of time.
The percentage spruiked is also grossly exaggerated. Fact is that if even 1% were to stay around, and if what they were being told was true, then the walls of AA would be bulging with happy sober people. Sadly they are not.
Instead there is row upon row of empty chairs in AA meetings. One reason for this is that they are not getting the basic information they need from sober alcoholics to be able to stay alive. A big part of the reason for this is due to the journo’s and the like of their persecution of the alcoholic.
The true situation of what happens to someone who is allergic to alcohol is not revealed. This is for many reasons and they are the selfish and greedy reasons of the true perpetrators in and out of AA meetings.